Today has been a fine day so far. Still nothing to do at work. I did some reading on the extremely slow trains. I am reading a book that I fell out of love with a long time ago, but which I must finish because it is on my orals list. It is the book to which Women in Love, is the sequel. It's basically about 3 generations of this English family, primarily the eldest daughter in the 3rd generation, Ursula, and how she's proud. The book is called The Rainbow. I think it's the biblical rainbow, the convenant never again to flood the world. That gets mentioned sometimes, but i don't know what it has to do with anything. Hopefully the last paragraph will clear it all up. Honestly I think the book is just bad, but I'm suspicious that that means I'm stupid. Plus I've spent such a long time reading it, I can't make sense of it as a whole anymore. Sometimes I like D.H. Lawrence though, I love when he says ridiculous things. Let's see if I can find something like that:
"She had the child, the palpable and immediate future was the child. If her soul had found no utterance, her womb had."
ha ha ha--talking wombs---very Lawrentian
"She could neither wake nor sleep. As if crushed between the past and the future, like a flower that comes above-ground to find a great stone lying above it, she was helpless."
heh heh---equally lawrentian is the image of a vagina with a rock over it. Like Jesus' tomb, if the tomb was not a hole but a stillborn flower. Every metaphor contains an internal battle, but no matter who wins, mama cries.
He's such a dick. It's amazing. And sometimes he's really smart about things. But in this book I think he's taking on too much. Or the question is so lofty that i can't bring myself to care about it. I think though that this is the book that comes back to haunt him in The Plumed Serpent--I guess that's productive.
I wish I could think of something amusing to discuss, and I guess I can, but I don't feel like getting into it right now, maybe later. |